→ FILES
⸜ ZOË KEATING, The Path w: Into The Trees, self-publishing/Tidal FLAC 16/44,1 ⸜ 2010
⸜ CANNONBAL EDDERLEY, Autumn Leaves w: Somethin’ Else, Blue Note/Tidal Master, FLAC MQA Studio 24/192 (1958/2014).
⸜ FINNEAS O'CONNELL, A Concert Six Months From Now w: Optymist, Interscope Records/Tidal Master, FLAC MQA 24/88,2 (2021).
⸜ VINI VICI, Make Us Stronger w: Ghost Rider, Dreamstate Records DREAMSTATE01, FLAC 16/44,1 (2017).
⸜ HANIA RANI, At Dawn w: Venice – Infinitely Avantgarde, XXIM Records/Tidal Master, FLAC MQA Studio 24/48 (2022).
»«
IN THE TEST OF A DEVICE OF THIS TYPE, that is, one that offers the ability to shape the sound and tailor it to one's own system and one's own needs, the first step for the tester must be to determine which mode is best for him and which works best in his system. This is, of course, a subjective approach.
However, a good audio journalist's reference system should be built to not only meet his requirements, but also to be as transparent as possible to changes within it. Therefore, it should be assumed that the settings he chooses will also work well for readers. So I began my test of the DAM-1 DAC with the PA-1 REF power supply by indicating the way the DAC sounds best.
⸜ MODES There are three filter modes at our disposal. We can use the classic filters "sewn" into the D/A converters. Yet this is the least recommended option. There is also a NOS mode, i.e. without oversampling, as well as conversion to DSD256.
It doesn't take long to determine that the absolute best for PCM signals is NOS mode. After boosting the output signal to 2.0 (the indication on the display) level, I received an unbelievably deep and dense sound. I'm familiar with this type of mode from various devices, most often - surprise surprise - made in China or Singapore, so I was prepared for what I would hear.
The scale of the changes, however, was a surprise to me. JOHN SCOFIELD's guitar from Swallow Tales or REYN QUOTRUNNAD's beautiful voice from Passion as remastered at JVC studios and released on XRCD24, but also all the other discs I listened to, all were extremely energetic and saturated. Energy and saturation - possibly fullness - are the two main elements you get with the NOS mode.
But the tonal balance also changes with it. There is less treble in recordings, and more low midrange and bass. The change is quite pronounced, so if you like a more direct and open presentation, you can use the NORMAL mode. Bodies of instruments are not as clear with it as they are with NOS, and the stage is a bit flattened. But openness, impact, carrying capacity - this is something that this mode offers. Interestingly, the class of sound is not too different from what you get with the mode without oversampling. Yes, I preferred NOS, but I could also listen to this device in its basic mode as well.
I didn't expect it, but I had the most trouble listening to the DAC in ALL DSD mode. In theory, it should be the best; after all, I myself use such upsampling in my SACD player, and consider it its most important advantage. Here, however, at least in comparison with the NOS and NORMAL modes, it performed worse.
When I sent a PCM signal to the DAC, the sound was smooth on the one hand and slightly brightened in the upper midrange on the other. The overall sound also has a slightly fuzzy edge and there was a lack of energy in the presentation. Much better results were achieved, on the other hand, when the input signal was DSD. Then it made sense and could be enjoyed. And yet, whenever I could, I chose the NOS mode and ran the test with this setting.
⸜ SOUND • NOS The tested converter plays fantastically. That is the thing I would like to convey to you in this text, the rest is didascalia. Important, but side issues. The device is very, but very "musical" - in the sense that the technique disappears behind the emotions that are extracted from the recordings. And this is true regardless of what kind of music we listen to.
The DAM-1 offers the listener a rich panorama and a dense, wide-bandwidth presentation. I mentioned earlier about the slight treble roll off in NOS mode, and that's true. But not all of it. On the one hand, the focus shifts towards the midrange, there would probably be less treble on the graph, but on the other hand, the energy of this range was higher just with NOS. And this is not a contradiction. Static measurements show one thing, and dynamic measurements show something else. The tested DAC shines precisely because it performs brilliantly with music, rather than staying with perfect measurement signals.
This worked out very well with the Passion album, but I heard it even better with the DIRE STRAITS disc and the ˻ 2 ˺ Money For Nothing. This time I went for the SAHM-XRCD2 version of this disc, which sounds in a rather hard way and sometimes a bit bright - it was taken directly from the U-matic PCM-1630 16/44.1 tape, onto which it was remastered. The DAM-1 showed it exactly that way, it didn't change the edge of the attack, didn't burn in the low midrange harder than necessary to get big sound sources. And yet the presentation was interesting with it, engaging with its energy and colors.
The tested DAC slightly weighs down the midrange. It does this primarily in NOS mode, but in the other two it is also an important component of their sound. LISA GERARD's vocalizations from the Duality album, recorded in 1998 with PETER BOURKE, an Australian drummer, composer and sound engineer, were thus heavier than with the Ayon player. And the latter, after all, is not one of the "light-sounding" players.
That's why the sound is so big with this converter, and instruments have big volume. There is no chiseling of details, instead there is energy, there is power, there is scale. Details are not celebrated not because they are not there in the sound, but because the presentation is so multicolored and so multifaceted that we stop paying attention to them, we listen to the whole, not the individual elements.
This is important because the DAM-1 with the PA-1 REF is a very resolving device. An example? - Reyna Quotrunnada's album is a collection of recordings from different studios. You can tell when they are changing, for example, by the fact that some of the recordings, such as ˻ 3 ˺ For Once or ˻ 5 ˺ My Funny Valentine were recorded with a slight overtone. It's distortion added to the signal, generated by a 50 or 60 Hz power supply that hasn't been fully filtered out. "Buzz" is generated by tube guitar amps and tube equipment. It's easy to miss if the system is not resolving enough or has lean bass. With the DAC we're talking about it was immediately clear.
However, there is something to consider when deciding on this device: it tries to make everything sound pleasant with it. Because the aforementioned albums sounded like that, so did the files played from the Lumin T3 working as a transport. ZOË KEATING in The Path, where the melodic line and backing are played on the cellos, both bowed and pizzicato, thus had as much energy and a similar tonal balance to the Dire Straits and Gerard/Burke duo albums. It was an excellent balance, an excellent sound, to be clear. But similar.
That's why switching a CD player to a file player (both working as transports) was not as pronounced as I've become accustomed to in other tests. This is because the DAM-1 gives the sound a depth and it sticks to it every time. Still, it is a beautiful presentation. That's why the exotic sounds from ˻ 6 ˺ Ride Across The River by Dire Straits as well as the beautiful ˻ ˻ 1 ˺ Autumn Leaves from CANNONBAL EDDERLEY's Somethin' Else, and all the ones that followed, were so saturated, so beautiful in how densely "woven" their matter was, that it was the greatest pleasure to listen to them.
▌ Summary
IT'S TIME TO GET TO IT: the old world is gone. Not yet in the biblical sense, not yet as the apostle John saw it and as he wrote about in Apocalypse (AP 21). But within our world, here and now, it seems that the hierarchy of many things is changing and there is a shift in focus. In the West, we still cling to the paradigm that the center of the audiophile world is in the States and/or Europe. This is no longer the case, we just haven't noticed it focused on ourselves.
The DAM-1 with the company's top-of-the-line power supply shows that for relatively little money, at least as far as high-end is concerned, you can design, build and sell devices offering fantastic sound. Also interesting in this is the direction in which Chinese and Singaporean manufacturers, whose products I've heard in recent years, are moving, They are betting on HDMI II2 connectivity and on NOS techniques and - some - discrete, resistor-based converters.
This gives a certain common denominator to all their products, in which Western manufacturers may see an opportunity to differentiate themselves. The DAM-1 offers dense, full, big sound. It is very resolving. It differentiates sounds within recordings brilliantly. But it also differentiates poorly within the recordings themselves. Whether you play FINNEAS in ˻ 1 ˺ A Concert Six Months From Now, with its rock tendencies, or the electronics of GHOST RIDER from ˻ 18 ˺ Make Us Stronger, or even the processed piano sound from HANIA RANI’s ˻ 13 ˺ At Dawn, each time it will be the same fullness, the same scale, the same tonality.
So there is a beauty you can listen to recordings no matter where they come from or how they were prepared, because they will sound great. They will all be energetic and big, so that the sound will not die out between the speakers, and it will tear the emotional veil between us and the performer. If this is what you are looking for in music, you are home, congratulations!
▌ DESIGN
BOTH SOUNDAWARE devices, the D/A converter DAM-1 and the power supply PA-1 REF, use the same enclosures. They differ only in the front and rear panels. This gives considerable savings, as has been practiced before by the British company Cyrus, for example. These are rigid aluminum plate structures, additionally stiffened with heat sinks. They are black and are placed on two sides. I mentioned heat sinks at the beginning. As it turns out, the active components in the power supply are screwed to the bottom of the case, not to them. So they are only part of the chassis.
The housings are finished by sandblasting, not - as we are used to in the US or Europe - by machining that looks like "scratching" with a brush. From the very beginning, as soon as the first devices from China intended for the audiophile market arrived this was one of their distinguishing features. The converter stands on feet molded into spikes, to which the manufacturer adds (I assume) pads. The power supply stands on classic feet.
˻ DAM-1 REF ˺ The front panel of the DAC features a small display and seven buttons, which allow user to select the input, mode or filter. There is a micro LED above the power button, and another of the same kind symmetrically on the other side of the front. On the back, there are a number of sockets with gold-plated contacts - the XLRs are from Neutrik. There's also a four-pin screw-in socket for the power supply and a ground terminal. Next to the HDMI jack we find four DIP switches, which allow us to set the "format" of data transfer. In turn, above the USB socket there is a button that separately activates this section.
The electronics were assembled on a single, small PCB. Almost all the components were surface-mounted, except for a few capacitors. Apparently, it was deemed worthwhile to do so in just these places - these are voltage stabilization circuits. These are ERO and Wima capacitors, as well as long-lost Elna Silmic II (with silk clad spacers).
Attention is drawn primarily to three, sizable chips, covered by gold-plated screens. One reads "PA1 Reference Module Inside," the second, largest, reads "Jinling DSP Reference Version," and the third reads "NOS, 1 bit DSD & Sigma-Deta Module." These designate the three main modules of the device. Between the first two there is still a DSP chip. Next to the DSP module are two, excellent-looking, temperature-compensated clocks, separately for each of the 44.1 and 48 kHz frequency families.
We should add that the board with the control of the display and the entire device, located at the front panel, has been separated from the rest of the circuit by a thick screen.
˻ PA-1 REF ˺ The interior of the power supply is also only partially filled. A quite large toroidal power transformer is placed in the front corner. It is shielded and flooded with vibration-reducing resin. It was screwed to the bottom not directly, but through some kind of flexible material. The AC supply from the EIC socket is filtered in front of it in a large choke and several capacitors.
From the transformer, power runs to a board bolted to the side, into which a large integrated rectifier bridge and an equally large voltage stabilizing circuit are soldered. A large 39,000 μF capacitor works with them. But it gets even more interesting further on - for right next to it we find two capacitors called D Cell. This is a technology belonging to their manufacturer, Maxwell Technologies. Each of these capacitors offers an incredible capacity of 370 Farads (!). Admittedly at 2.7 volts, but still. They are separated from the bottom of the enclosure by soft micro-rubber. From here, thick cables ( marked for directionality) go to the board on the rear panel, where there are circuits re-clocking the USB signal.
They are superbly prepared devices, both on the mechanical and electrical side. Both bring proprietary high-end technologies at a price that the rest of the world can only dream of. ●
▌ Technical specifications (according to the manufacturer)
Digital inputs:
• USB: PCM 32 bits, 384 kHz, DSD256
• optical: PCM 32 bits,192 kHz, DSD(DOP) 64
• AES/EBU: PCM 32 bits, 384 kHz, DSD(DOP) 128
• RCA: PCM 32 bits, 384 kHz, DSD(DOP) 128
• HDMI IIS input: PCM 32 bits, 384 kHz, DSD256
Maximum output signal (switchable):
• RCA: 1,7 V/2 V
• XLR: 3,4 V/4 V
S/N: 129 dB
Dynamics: 129 dB
THD+N: 0,0001%
Power consumption: ~10 W
Dimensions (W x H x D): 320 x 223 x 60 mm
Weight: 4,3 kg